Fake certificates endanger seafarers
(Posted on 28/02/20)
The problem of fraudulent certificates is well-known and pronounced in the maritime industry. Already in 2001 the IMO detected 12.635 cases of certification forgery. While this figure is shocking enough, there is no way of knowing how many other cases have gone undetected.
While the scale of the problem is unquantifiable, the fact remains that there are currently thousands of false certificates in circulation. As such, any seafarer certification that comes from sources that do not verify the supporting evidence will remain questionable and potentially suspect. As the problem of fake certification grows, companies require verified certificates that prove the seafarers have passed the necessary training.
“The competence of seafarers is the most crucial factor in the safe and efficient operation of ships and has a direct impact on the safety of life at sea and the protection of the marine environment,” IMO.
STCW was created to ensure that the highest standards of seafarers’ competence are maintained globally. However, with false certification in circulation, companies are always at risk of employing someone who has been issued faked documentation. This increases the risk of personnel carrying out tasks they are not trained to perform, risking the safety of the crew, the ship and the environment.
Fake certification is a global issue. An EU-sponsored pilot project, branded ‘GetQuality’, revealed that “nearly every tenth seafarer worldwide” has experienced fraudulent certificates, whether directly or indirectly. The study found that the fake certificates undermine the training and certification system, evoke suspicion and distrust between partners and countries, and cause danger to human safety at sea. One of the largest concerns is the lack of verification process following proof of certification.
In India the problem made headlines recently. In what was described as “the biggest fake certificate scam yet”, India’s Directorate-General of Shipping found fake certificates from five training institutes where the necessary training had not been completed. After initially being barred from working, some seafarers have since been allowed to take new courses at approved training institutes to restart their careers. Others face a five-year disbarment.
As a leading providing in maritime training, Seagull Maritime has developed a system that makes it easy for anyone to verify the validity of certificates. Seagull’s department is subject to regular audits to ensure that the course diplomas are issued in accordance with strict QA standards. The company’s QR codes ensure the authenticity of new course diplomas’ can be confirmed at all times, while older course diplomas are verified through the imprinted Seagull logo.
With so many fake certificates out there, Seagull Maritime’s solutions ensure all diplomas are subject to a strict course verification process that proves the seafarer has completed the necessary training.
The Italian ship-owning Group Premuda, controlled by Pillarstone, the industrial and financial platform... Read more
Leading international shipping insurer North P&I Club has launched a new marine risk awareness solution... Read more
The International Maritime Employers’ Council (IMEC) has commissioned Ocean Technologies Group... Read more
ICC International Maritime Bureau (IMB) figures show a rise in piracy and armed robbery on the world... Read more
China Classification Society (CCS) grew its serviced fleet to 34,974 vessels in 2019, marking another... Read more
Leading international catering management and training provider, MCTC has revealed that COVID-19 has... Read more
The International Association of Dry Cargo Shipowners (INTERCARGO) has held its Annual General Meeting... Read more
The BRS Group has a new chairman. As the partnership agreement stipulates, on reaching the age of 65... Read more
Høglund Marine Solutions (Høglund) and Veracity by DNV GL (Veracity) have signed a collaboration... Read more
“As one of the world’s major shipping nations, Germany needs an LNG infrastructure for its... Read more