- About us
- IBJ Awards
- Free Sample
- Contact us
USDA rule lacks transparency says NAGFA
(Posted on 18/05/20)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) finalised rule for regulating plant-based agricultural biotechnology products takes an overly broad approach that does not deliver adequate transparency and could contribute to future trade disruptions, said the USA’s National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) in a May 14 statement.
NGFA, established in 1896, consists of more than 1,000 grain, feed, processing, exporting and other grain-related companies that operate more than 7,000 facilities and handle more than 70 percent of all U.S. grains and oilseeds.
USDA announced on May 14 its final rule updating its biotechnology regulations under the Plant Protection Act. The final rule exempts from regulation plants that could have been developed through conventional breeding. In addition, a number of gene editing techniques, including a single base pair substitution and sole deletions, are exempt from regulation under the final rule.
In response, NGFA issued the following statement:
“NGFA supports the use of agricultural biotechnology and plant breeding innovation to provide farmers with improved technology that can contribute to a sustainable, abundant and affordable food and feed supply.
“However, for grain elevators and exporters, as well as farmers and downstream customers they serve, there is a pressing need to provide transparency in the types and uses of gene-editing and other technology being deployed and commercialized in U.S. grain and oilseed production. On that score, NGFA is disappointed that USDA’s final rule allows crop technology developers to make a ‘self-determination’ that their plant is exempt from APHIS regulatory oversight without a concurrent obligation to notify the agency so that such information is available to the marketplace and consumers.
NGFA noted that APHIS in its final rule makes repeated references to the importance of preserving U.S. agricultural trade and states that it is committed to “continuing to work with international trading partners and exporters to resolve trade concerns.” But NGFA emphasized that “transparency in the types of crop technology being deployed and commercialized is essential to avoiding future trade disruptions.”
USDA solicited comments from the public on the proposed rule in 2019. NGFA and several other grain- and oilseed-based agribusiness associations issued an August 2019 joint statement outlining concerns about the proposed rule’s lack of regulatory oversight for gene-edited crops, the “self-determination” provision granted to crop technology providers, and whether governmental authorities in key U.S. export markets would accept USDA’s approach.
In markets around the world, including Japan, sustainability is top of mind for consumers and end users... Read more
The European fertilizer industry has acknowledged the Commission’s proposal to add a new instrument... Read more
Rio Tinto's ISAL smelter in Iceland has been certified by the Aluminium Stewardship Initiative (ASI)... Read more
Australia’s peak national grain grower advocacy group has welcomed the Australian Government&rsquo... Read more
The National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA, and a coalition of agricultural shippers including the... Read more
Rusal, a leading global aluminium producer, has begun mining at a new open pit quarry at the Vezhayu... Read more
Cargill has announced plans to break ground on a new canola processing facility in Regina, Saskatchewan... Read more
Rusal, a leading global aluminium producer, has announced that it has successfully completed the acquisition... Read more
The U.S. Grains Council (USGC) has published its 2020/2021 Sorghum Quality Report and for the second... Read more
Rio Tinto has released its 2020 Taxes paid. The company’s economic contribution report, which... Read more