- About us
- IBJ Awards
- Free Sample
- Contact us
USDA rule lacks transparency says NAGFA
(Posted on 18/05/20)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) finalised rule for regulating plant-based agricultural biotechnology products takes an overly broad approach that does not deliver adequate transparency and could contribute to future trade disruptions, said the USA’s National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) in a May 14 statement.
NGFA, established in 1896, consists of more than 1,000 grain, feed, processing, exporting and other grain-related companies that operate more than 7,000 facilities and handle more than 70 percent of all U.S. grains and oilseeds.
USDA announced on May 14 its final rule updating its biotechnology regulations under the Plant Protection Act. The final rule exempts from regulation plants that could have been developed through conventional breeding. In addition, a number of gene editing techniques, including a single base pair substitution and sole deletions, are exempt from regulation under the final rule.
In response, NGFA issued the following statement:
“NGFA supports the use of agricultural biotechnology and plant breeding innovation to provide farmers with improved technology that can contribute to a sustainable, abundant and affordable food and feed supply.
“However, for grain elevators and exporters, as well as farmers and downstream customers they serve, there is a pressing need to provide transparency in the types and uses of gene-editing and other technology being deployed and commercialized in U.S. grain and oilseed production. On that score, NGFA is disappointed that USDA’s final rule allows crop technology developers to make a ‘self-determination’ that their plant is exempt from APHIS regulatory oversight without a concurrent obligation to notify the agency so that such information is available to the marketplace and consumers.
NGFA noted that APHIS in its final rule makes repeated references to the importance of preserving U.S. agricultural trade and states that it is committed to “continuing to work with international trading partners and exporters to resolve trade concerns.” But NGFA emphasized that “transparency in the types of crop technology being deployed and commercialized is essential to avoiding future trade disruptions.”
USDA solicited comments from the public on the proposed rule in 2019. NGFA and several other grain- and oilseed-based agribusiness associations issued an August 2019 joint statement outlining concerns about the proposed rule’s lack of regulatory oversight for gene-edited crops, the “self-determination” provision granted to crop technology providers, and whether governmental authorities in key U.S. export markets would accept USDA’s approach.
Rio Tinto has published its 2020 Annual Report and its Sustainability Fact Book. These documents complement... Read more
Rusal, a leading global aluminium producer, has announced that it has been named the preferred global... Read more
Rusal a leading global aluminium producer, has announced that it has agreed to acquire the business... Read more
Rio Tinto, Paul Wurth S.A. and SHS-Stahl-Holding-Saar GmbH & Co. KGaA (SHS) have signed a Memorandum... Read more
The share of agro-industrial products in the general structure of exports from Ukraine in 2020 reached... Read more
Rusal, a leading global aluminium producer, has announced operating results for the fourth quarter of... Read more
Global crude steel production reached 1,864.0 million tonnes (Mt) for the year 2020, down by 0.9% compared... Read more
The Agricultural Industries Confederation (AIC) in the UK believes that a ban on the sale and use of... Read more
Palantir Technologies Inc. have announced it has signed a multi-year enterprise agreement for its Foundry... Read more
Chief Executive Officer, Mike Henry has released a statement on BHP’s operational review for the... Read more