TelestackThe Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology TBA GroupPort of StocktonCoaltrans Asia 2021Port of South Louisiana
  • The Wolfson Centre for Bulk Solids Handling Technology
  • TMS Awards 2021
  • Van Aalst
  • Cimbria
  • Sailors Society
  • Cleveland Cascades Ltd

US steel groups divided on tariffs

US steel groups divided on tariffs

(Posted on 31/01/19)

The heads of several steel industry associations in the United States remained divided on the effectiveness of the Section 232 tariffs on US steel imports, but found some common ground on the subject of the yet to be signed US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA).

With no end to the Section 232 tariffs on US imports of steel in sight, the focal point of a panel discussion at SteelOrbis’ 10th Annual Rebar & Wire Rod Conference in Las Vegas last week centred around the impact thus far of, and possible end game for, the Trump administration’s signature trade policy.

“Quotas I think are the lesser of two evils, quotas have the advantage of at least allowing material in,” Independent Steel Alliance president Chris Casey said.

“No question, they are better than tariffs, but my question would be, if we’re going to have a quota system are we still going to penalize the buyers on the price side?” he asked.

“If materials [imported steel] are going to come in, are they going to come in at reasonable prices?” Casey asked.

From his perspective, John D. Foster, president of Kurt Orban Partners and chairman of the American Institute for International Steel (AIIS), did not see quotas as a viable solution to dealing with global steel overcapacity.

“There’s also talk of replacing tariffs with quotas, which could be an interesting possibility... “I think again, as we saw back in the Section 201 days, that’s a failed model as well... we actually saw domestic production capacity go down rather than up,” Foster said.

“I think the quota system is extremely burdensome on both the Commerce Department and US consumers,” he said, also noting issues with the Section 232 exclusion process.

Further to that, Foster said the rise in domestic steel prices that has accompanied the implementation of the Section 232 tariffs has had the unintended effect of ensuring there still is a market for imported steel within US borders.

“We need to look at the fundamental reason imports were able to continue at all.. I think that was the significant price increases that put US steel prices at the highest in the world,” he said. “In other words, any return of significant imports was somewhat of a self-inflicted wound so to speak, for many of the increases eclipsed the tariff rates themselves.”

For Casey, imports remain vital to ensure domestic steel prices do not rise to levels that harm US market participants, who cited nervousness among independent fabricators about sourcing material in the wake of Commercial Metals Co's acquisition of Gerdau’s North American rebar assets, given the number of downstream operations involved.

Even independent fabricators who don’t participate in the import market have indicated that “it’s important to have a small amount of that material in the market to keep domestics honest," Casey said. “That’s a phrase that comes up an awful lot.”

Meanwhile, Thomas J. Gibson, president and chief executive officer of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), stressed that the Section 232 tariffs have succeeded where previous efforts failed.

“We ran into the same great wall of obfuscation that we always ran into with China... They would not produce the data, and it would always be kick the can down the road and let’s get to the next meeting,” he said. “Thank God we have an administration that’s going to back up the rhetoric with some tough action.”

Gibson said one of the more crucial successes of the tariffs have been their ability to force policy changes in other countries. “Steel from China is going somewhere else,” he said. “A lot of these other countries are starting to wake up and impose their own safeguard actions against steel from certain areas, and quite frankly we think that’s a good thing.”

Positive impacts from the tariffs on the domestic industry, Gibson said, include steel shipments increasing by 4.7% at domestic mills last year, import volumes declining by 10.5% and capacity utilization improving 81% in November from 76% in April.

Nonetheless, Casey outlined what he said were the three primary negative effects of the tariffs.

Not only have the tariffs raised the cost of steel to the extent that wood has emerged as a competitor to steel for building material, but they’ve also created supply chain anxiety in that market participants have to find new sources for material that fall under the tariffs, Casey told attendees.

Casey also said the Trump administration’s tariffs have led to retaliatory measures from other countries, suppressing the demand for American products in global markets.

Though Casey conceded the negative impacts have yet to be fully felt while fabricators and contractors enter 2019 with strong backlogs, that day is coming.

“We will see the negative impacts of these tariffs, we’re just not seeing them yet,” he said.

Latest News

thyssenkrupp sells mining business to FLSmidth

(Posted on 29/07/21)

thyssenkrupp has announced the sale of its Mining Technologies business unit to the Danish company FLSmidth... Read more


Rio Tinto progresses studies for underground mining at Kennecott

(Posted on 26/07/21)

Rio Tinto has approved a $108 million investment in underground development to enable early orebody... Read more


En+ Group sustainability report sets new targets

(Posted on 20/07/21)

En+ Group, the world’s largest producer of low carbon aluminium, has published its 2020 Sustainability... Read more


Rusal to supply Rheinfelden with low carbon aluminium

(Posted on 15/07/21)

Rusal, a leading global aluminium producer, has announced that it will supply its plant Aluminium Rheinfelden... Read more


Largest Korean steel producer and Rio Tinto sign climate MOU

(Posted on 11/07/21)

Rio Tinto and POSCO, the largest steel producer in South Korea and one of the world’s leading... Read more


BHP announces divestment of Cerrejón interest

(Posted on 05/07/21)

BHP has announced that it has signed a Sale and Purchase Agreement with Glencore to divest its 33.3... Read more


Galena fund: first for commodities industry

(Posted on 01/07/21)

Galena Asset Management, a wholly-owned investment subsidiary of Trafigura, one of the world’s... Read more


Force majeure declared at Richards Bay Minerals

(Posted on 01/07/21)

Rio Tinto has declared force majeure on customer contracts at Richards Bay Minerals (RBM) in South Africa... Read more


Rio Tinto to drive decarbonisation with Schneider

(Posted on 28/06/21)

Rio Tinto, a leading global mining and metals company, and Schneider Electric, the leader in digital... Read more


Rio Tinto deploys first fully autonomous water trucks

(Posted on 22/06/21)

Rio Tinto will deploy the world’s first fully autonomous water trucks at its $2.6 billion Gudai... Read more


TOC EventsCimbriaVan AalstCleveland Cascades LtdSailors SocietyBühler GmbH
  • Coaltrans Asia 2021
  • Bühler GmbH
  • Port of South Louisiana
  • Telestack
  • TBA Group

Subscribe to our newsletter

Keep up to date with the latest global news in bulk cargo handling and shipping