Proposed USDA rules ‘fundamentally flawed’

(Posted on 19/08/19)

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) new proposed rule for regulating plant-based agricultural biotechnology products, as drafted, is “fundamentally flawed” and could contribute to future trade disruptions, the National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) and several other grain- and oilseed-based agribusiness associations said in a joint statement submitted on 6 August.

The NGFA, established in 1896, consists of more than 1,100 grain, feed, processing, exporting and other grain-related companies that operate more than 7,000 facilities and handle more than 70 percent of all U.S. grains and oilseeds. Its membership includes grain elevators; feed and feed ingredient manufacturers; biofuels companies; grain and oilseed processors and millers; exporters; livestock and poultry integrators; and associated firms that provide goods and services to the nation’s grain, feed and processing industry.

“Our industry, and our farmer-customers emphatically need to avoid the costly trade disruptions that have been associated periodically with transgenic biotechnology,” wrote the NGFA, Corn Refiners Association, National Oilseed Processors Association, North American Export Grain Association and North American Millers Association. “If the U.S. government’s regulatory oversight approach to genome editing and other plant breeding innovation is out of step with the domestic food industry or America’s significant export markets, it will have perilous repercussions for the grain and oilseed value chain, including U.S. farmers.”

The groups stressed that they strongly support the use of biotechnology and plant-breeding innovation, including genome editing, for its role in providing an abundant, affordable and environmentally sustainable food, feed and energy supply for U.S. and global consumers. But the groups also stressed that a “cornerstone of U.S. agriculture’s competitiveness” is its ability to efficiently and cost-effectively market America’s agricultural abundance. “It is through this dual lens – support for technological innovation while ensuring the continued efficient marketability of crops in which it is used” – that the five organizations said APHIS’s proposed rule needs to be viewed.

Under the proposed rule published on June 6, USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) – which has authority to determine whether agricultural biotech traits pose a plant pest or noxious weed risk to the environment – would exempt most crops developed with gene-editing techniques from regulatory oversight. APHIS’s proposed rule states that such plants can be developed through traditional breeding techniques, making them unlikely to pose a greater plant pest risk than conventionally bred crops. The APHIS proposal also would empower crop developers to make a “self-determination” that their plant is exempt from APHIS regulatory oversight, without providing any notification to the agency. Under the proposed rule, technology providers would have the “option” to request written confirmation from APHIS that their self-determinations are valid.

The agribusiness organizations said such a broad self-determination approach “risks undermining consumer acceptance and international regulatory recognition of APHIS’s regulatory oversight.”

The organizations urged APHIS to amend its proposed rule to require all technology providers to notify the agency in advance before introducing gene-edited or other plant breeding innovation traits for commercialization – even those within APHIS’s expressly exempted categories – to provide needed transparency to the market and to consumers. Doing so would enable the agency to issue an official attestation that the trait does not pose a plant pest risk, “thereby providing an important tool to efficiently market U.S. agricultural products.”

The statement also reiterated NGFA’s long-held belief that obtaining international recognition or acceptance in significant U.S. export markets should be a precondition to avoid potential trade disruption before APHIS proceeds with a final rule.

Latest News

SSAB invests $74 Million to expand steel production in Alabama

Highly-specialised global steel company, SSAB has announced a significant investment of approximately... Read more

GGC welcomes new Canadian government and urges farm priorities action

Grain Growers of Canada (GGC) has welcomed Prime Minister Mark Carney and all Members of Parliament... Read more

US Soybean growers disappointed in 2;4-D Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties vote

The International Trade Commission in the USA has voted in favour of imposing final anti-dumping (AD... Read more

Ukraine already sown two million hectares of spring grains

As of April 25, 2025, farmers in all regions of Ukraine have sown 2M hectares (ha) of spring grain and... Read more

Condobolin rail upgrade fast-tracks NSW grain

GrainCorp’s rail site at Condobolin, in the heart of central west New South Wales, Australia,... Read more

Rio Tinto and AMG assess low-carbon aluminium project in India

Rio Tinto and AMG Metals & Materials (AMG M&M), an energy transition solutions provider, have... Read more

BHP record iron ore and copper production demonstrates resilience

BHP has released its Operational Review for the nine months ended 31 March 2025.BHP Chief Executive... Read more

WTO: Trump’s tariffs will shrink global trade

The volume of world merchandise trade is expected to decline by 0.2% in 2025 under current conditions... Read more

$235million syndicated loan agreement to boost UAE trade with Trafigura

In a strategic move to empower UAE exporters and advance the nation’s economic diversification... Read more

Anglo American update on sale of steelmaking coal business to Peabody

Anglo American plc has noted the recent statement issued by Peabody Energy in relation to the definitive... Read more