TelestackVigan Engineering S.AThe Maritime Standards Awards 2018Bühler GmbHOvetStemm
  • Ovet
  • TMS Tanker Conference 2018
  • Cimbria Bulk Equipment A/S
  • FLSmidth
  • Port of Stockton
  • Cleveland Cascades Ltd

AIIS files lawsuit to challenge Trump’s steel tariffs

(Posted on 04/07/18)

The American Institute for International Steel (AIIS) and two of its member companies, SIM-TEX, LP, of Waller, Texas, and KURT ORBAN PARTNERS, LLC, of Burlingame, California, have filed suit in the United States Court of International Trade in New York City challenging the constitutionality of the statute under which President Trump imposed a 25% tariff on imported steel. The lawsuit seeks a declaration that the law relied on by President Trump to impose that tariff is unconstitutional, as well as a court order preventing further enforcement of the 25% tariff increase.

In its lawsuit, AIIS and the two companies allege that the statute, Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, violates the constitutional prohibition against Congress delegating its legislative powers to the President because it lacks any “intelligible principle” to limit the discretion of the President. Section 232 allows the President to impose unlimited tariffs or create other trade barriers at his unfettered discretion if he believes they are needed so that “imports will not threaten to impair the national security,” which is expansively defined in Section 232.

“In addition to the totally open-ended choice of how to counter any threat that imports may present, Section 232 allows the President to consider virtually any effect on the U.S. economy as part of ‘national security’,” said AIIS President Richard Chriss.

AIIS is America’s leading voice for the steel supply chain, and the only voice in Washington, D.C. for free and responsible trade in steel. Its members depend in a variety of different ways on imported steel for their economic well-being. Most of the members of AIIS – which include railroads and other transportation companies, port authorities, union locals, traders and logistics companies–do not pay the tariff increase directly. Their businesses and employees are harmed because the tariff increase significantly reduces the amount of steel imported into the United States—its intended effect—thereby reducing their revenues, and the hours and possibly jobs of their workers, which are dependent in significant part on how much product their businesses handle.

The steel tariff has numerous additional negative effects on U.S. business. American ports and their workers are seeing a sharp drop in throughput in their own businesses. In addition, U.S. steel-using manufacturers are encountering product price increases of 50% or more and are experiencing difficulty in obtaining the steel they need, regardless of whether they buy domestic-sourced or imported steel.

The AIIS complaint also rests on another constitutional flaw in the law, which plaintiffs say violates the doctrine of separation of powers and the system of checks and balances that the Constitution protects: there is no provision for judicial review of the President’s decisions in how he responds to the perceived threat to national security from imported steel. Moreover, recent Supreme Court cases have precluded judicial review of discretionary decisions by the President under similar statutes, and the Justice Department in a recent case involving this very tariff has stated that the courts cannot rule on whether the President has complied with the law.

“Unlike most cases brought against actions of the Trump administration, it is Congress—through its delegation of unfettered discretion to the President in this statute—and not the President that is the violator of the Constitution,” noted Alan Morrison, lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “The President simply took advantage of the opportunity to impose his views on international trade on the American people, with nothing in the law to stop him.”

Morrison also pointed out that the lack of judicial review, on top of the completely unmoored powers of the President, “represents a far more dangerous threat to our democracy than any steel imports ever could.”
With their complaint, plaintiffs filed a motion asking the Chief Judge of the Court of International Trade to appoint three judges, instead of a single judge, to hear this case. That request is supported by a specific federal statute and a rule of the Court that authorize such an appointment when a case presents a constitutional challenge or has “significant implications” for the administration of the law. Plaintiffs believe that if the case is decided by a three judge court, there is a direct appeal to the Supreme Court, without having to go to the Federal Circuit, which is the normal review court for the Court of International Trade. That route would provide a speedier means of resolving this case, which is in the interest of all concerned.

Latest News

German coal imports decline sharply

(Posted on 19/07/18)

The German Coal Importer Association (Verein der Kohlenimporteure e. V.) have reported that the use... Read more


Australian Premier visits Esperance following job save

(Posted on 19/07/18)

The Mineral Resources' acquisition of Koolyanobbing iron ore mine will allow iron ore exports from... Read more


World’s largest robot delivers for Rio Tinto

(Posted on 19/07/18)

Rio Tinto has achieved a significant milestone with the first delivery of iron ore by an autonomous... Read more


Report outlines U.S. soybean export outlook

(Posted on 04/07/18)

A report from Rabobank released this month summarises the outlook for U.S. soybean exports, which it... Read more


Aluminium China 2018 showcases Asia’s thriving industry despite US tariffs

(Posted on 04/07/18)

In the face of the US tariff storm, the Aluminium China 2018 exhibition and conference in Shanghai from... Read more


Petra Nova project highlights technical potential

(Posted on 27/06/18)

According to Liam McHugh, World Coal Association Policy Manager, Petra Nova demonstrates technical potential... Read more


Scrap handling growth in Amsterdam

(Posted on 27/06/18)

The export of scrap from the port of Amsterdam is growing steadily. About 600,000 tons of scrap was... Read more


WCA urges climate change action

(Posted on 27/06/18)

The World Cement Association (WCA) has warned of the growing pressures on the global cement industry... Read more


Vale announces the passing of two times president, Eliezer Batista

(Posted on 21/06/18)

With immense sadness, Vale has announced the passing of Eliezer Batista, the first person to hold the... Read more


Rusal begins shipping bauxite from Dian-Dian

(Posted on 21/06/18)

UC Rusal, a leading global aluminium producer, is pleased to announce the completion of the first stage... Read more


Port of StocktonNAVTORCimbria Bulk Equipment A/STMS Awards 2016 winnersDocksolidTBA - Software Solutions & Services for ports, terminals & warehouses
  • Telestack
  • NAVTOR
  • Vigan Engineering S.A
  • Stemm

Subscribe to our newsletter

Keep up to date with the latest global news in bulk cargo handling and shipping