(Posted on 07/06/26)
TT Club, the leading global transport and logistics insurer, highlights the critical complexities ports face when responding to ships in distress. Far from a simple "yes or no" decision, granting a place of refuge requires a structured, risk-led approach rather than an immediate, reactive response.
When a ship experiences fire, structural damage, or cargo instability, ports face severe pressure. While a common misconception is that acknowledging a casualty automatically means accepting it, a knee-jerk refusal can inadvertently escalate the situation by pushing the hazard offshore into less controlled environments. The fundamental question for port authorities must not be whether to accept the ship, but where the associated risk can be best managed.
A spectrum of options
"Refuge" does not automatically mean bringing a ship alongside a berth - which can introduce severe exposures to local infrastructure and communities. Instead, it should be viewed as a spectrum of options, including anchorage, sheltered waters, or a managed offshore position.
The operational realities of these incidents often clash with common expectations:
The critical challenge of fire
Shipboard fires remain one of the most unpredictable and dangerous scenarios. Accepting a ship with a fire onboard risks transferring a high-heat, toxic hazard into a populated, infrastructure-dense environment. It is important to engage early with local fire and rescue services to rehearse access, water supply, and air monitoring before an incident occurs.
Harry Palmer, Risk Assessment Manager at TT Club explained “Places of refuge are rare, high-stakes events that demand decisive leadership. Effective coastal and port response is not a simple yes or no. Success depends on thorough preparedness - having clear decision-making frameworks and established relationships so that under pressure, authorities are executing a proven plan rather than improvising. Ultimately, refuge is not about where the ship wants to go, it is about where the risk can be best managed”.
Proportionate decision-making is driven by preparedness, not luck. Ports that successfully navigate these crises rely on robust risk-assessment frameworks, pre-identified refuge options, and regular scenario exercises. This operational discipline enables ports to say no when a risk is unacceptable, or yes with the appropriate controls to manage the event safely over time.
The construction of the first methanol-powered Green Handy vessel has commenced at China Merchants Jinling... Read more
Survitec is warning shipowners and operators that port state control (PSC) detentions are becoming an... Read more
The Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) Registry recognized several milestones and achievements during... Read more
From insurance and risk management to energy transition, digitalisation and maritime security, the Posidonia... Read more
Prevention at Sea (PaS), a leading maritime compliance, auditing, and digital solutions provider, has... Read more
NorthStandard has reported strong financial results, continued strategic progress and enhanced support... Read more
Hundreds of vessels remain unable to transit the Strait of Hormuz and, in the event of a return to more... Read more
The Bahamas has regained eligibility for the United States Coast Guard’s QUALSHIP 21 programme... Read more
Ship to ship (STS) transfers are an established part of dry bulk operations, and they are growing. As... Read more
Columbia Group has strengthened its commitment to developing the next generation of maritime professionals... Read more