(Posted on 07/06/26)
TT Club, the leading global transport and logistics insurer, highlights the critical complexities ports face when responding to ships in distress. Far from a simple "yes or no" decision, granting a place of refuge requires a structured, risk-led approach rather than an immediate, reactive response.
When a ship experiences fire, structural damage, or cargo instability, ports face severe pressure. While a common misconception is that acknowledging a casualty automatically means accepting it, a knee-jerk refusal can inadvertently escalate the situation by pushing the hazard offshore into less controlled environments. The fundamental question for port authorities must not be whether to accept the ship, but where the associated risk can be best managed.
A spectrum of options
"Refuge" does not automatically mean bringing a ship alongside a berth - which can introduce severe exposures to local infrastructure and communities. Instead, it should be viewed as a spectrum of options, including anchorage, sheltered waters, or a managed offshore position.
The operational realities of these incidents often clash with common expectations:
The critical challenge of fire
Shipboard fires remain one of the most unpredictable and dangerous scenarios. Accepting a ship with a fire onboard risks transferring a high-heat, toxic hazard into a populated, infrastructure-dense environment. It is important to engage early with local fire and rescue services to rehearse access, water supply, and air monitoring before an incident occurs.
Harry Palmer, Risk Assessment Manager at TT Club explained “Places of refuge are rare, high-stakes events that demand decisive leadership. Effective coastal and port response is not a simple yes or no. Success depends on thorough preparedness - having clear decision-making frameworks and established relationships so that under pressure, authorities are executing a proven plan rather than improvising. Ultimately, refuge is not about where the ship wants to go, it is about where the risk can be best managed”.
Proportionate decision-making is driven by preparedness, not luck. Ports that successfully navigate these crises rely on robust risk-assessment frameworks, pre-identified refuge options, and regular scenario exercises. This operational discipline enables ports to say no when a risk is unacceptable, or yes with the appropriate controls to manage the event safely over time.
The Maritime Association for Clean Seas (MACS) has published a series of practical guides to enable... Read more
Shanghai has officially become the world’s second-most prominent shipping hub, according to the... Read more
OceanScore, the maritime data and sustainability company helping shipping and ports turn regulatory... Read more
Bulk carrier safety continues to show steady long-term improvement, but the nature of risk facing seafarers... Read more
Following stronger than expected operational performance in dry cargo, reduced costs associated with... Read more
Algoma Central Corporation, a leading provider of marine transportation services, has announced that... Read more
Major maritime, ports and energy companies have been identified by Cydome’s threat-intelligence... Read more
As the global shipping industry faces mounting concerns over future crew availability, Danica Crewing... Read more
Following an attack on a vessel in the Gulf of Oman, IMO has decided to temporarily pause its evacuation... Read more
Leading health and wellness platform OneCare Group is calling on shipping leaders to recognise the immense... Read more