Remember the BIMCO war risks clauses

(Posted on 04/03/26)

In light of the security concerns in the Persian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Indian Ocean, Gulf of Aden and Southern Red Sea, BIMCO, the international shipping association representing shipowners, is encouraging members to undertake a careful review of their existing and future charter party terms.

BIMCO members cover two-thirds of the world's tonnage and consist of local, global, small and large companies. They are an organisation and global shipping community of 2,100 members in 120 countries.

A statement on the BIMCO website continues, “Owners and charterers are advised to engage proactively with their contractual counterparties to limit exposure to vessel cargo, and crew risks in the affected region. Each charter party must be assessed on its own terms, and you should familiarise yourself with the rights, obligations and risk allocation created by any BIMCO VOYWAR, CONWARTIME or other relevant provisions including any Force Majeure clauses, included in their agreements.

Incorporation of the BIMCO War Risk Clause for Voyage Charter Parties 2025 (VOYWAR 2025)

Where parties have incorporated an unamended VOYWAR 2025 clause into their voyage charter, the owners may be entitled to refuse or withdraw from performing a voyage if the vessel, cargo or crew may be exposed to war risks, as defined in the clause, in the affected area. The clause provides contractual mechanisms to deviate, adjust the voyage, request alternative orders, or decline to proceed, depending on the level of risk and intelligence available at the time. Owners’ rights under the clause must, however, be exercised reasonably and based on an objective assessment of the risk of the specific situation.

Charterers should therefore be aware that the clause may significantly impact the vessel’s obligations and the commercial expectations of voyage performance. Conversely, owners should understand the importance of the procedural steps in the clause—such as notices and request for new orders.

Some contracts may contain earlier versions of VOYWAR and while BIMCO invariably recommends that the most recent version is used, it is important that the parties look to the terms of the clause incorporated when assessing the rights provided.

Incorporation of the BIMCO War Risk Clause for Time Charter Parties 2025 (CONWARTIME 2025)

For time charter parties incorporating an unamended CONWARTIME 2025 clause, the structure and effect differ from VOYWAR 2025. Under CONWARTIME, owners may refuse to comply with orders that would expose the vessel, cargo or crew to defined war risks in the region. Once the vessel is placed at the charterers’ disposal, the commercial use of the ship becomes the charterers’ responsibility, and the clause is designed to balance navigational safety with the broad employment rights granted to the charterers under a time charter.

Parties should carefully consider how the clause interacts with offhire provisions, trading limits, and any region-specific protective measures. Practical issues, such as whether alternative safe routes exist, whether additional insurance premiums apply, and how delays are treated, must be carefully evaluated considering the particular charter party. It is important to note that the clause applies whether the risk assessed existed at the time of entering into this charter party or occurred thereafter and hence it is important to include this also in future contracts.

Incorporation of the BIMCO Force Majeure Clause 2022

If parties have incorporated the unamended BIMCO Force Majeure Clause, they should be aware that the clause applies only where a qualifying force majeure event occurs and prevents, delays or makes performance of obligations impossible. The Force Majeure Clause is not designed to function as a general “risk allocation tool,” and it does not automatically excuse performance merely because operating in a region becomes riskier, more expensive or commercially undesirable.

Increased risk of attacks, security incidents or geopolitical volatility in the Persian/Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Indian Ocean, Gulf of Aden and Southern Red Sea may not in itself constitute a force majeure event. Parties must therefore consider whether their specific circumstances satisfy the strict test of prevention and whether the notice requirements and mitigation obligations can be met in practice.

Considering the Clauses Together

These clauses, whether unamended BIMCO versions or amended variations, must be interpreted together, within their contractual and factual context. This also includes other relevant trade specific clauses including own Force Majeure or War Risk clauses. Their combined effect will determine:

Whether the vessel may refuse to proceed

Whether delays fall on owners or charterers

Whether deviation is permitted

How extra costs are allocated, and

Whether a party may be excused from performance at all.

No clause operates in isolation. The interplay between war risk provisions, force majeure protections and any bespoke amendments can materially change the balance of risk in volatile regions.

Recommended Actions

We strongly encourage you to:

Consult your P&I Clubs at an early stage

Seek advice from insurers, local P&I correspondents, agents and, where necessary, legal counsel

Monitor ongoing updates regarding the security situation, and

Document internal assessments to support contractual decisions made under VOYWAR, CONWARTIME or force majeure provisions.

BIMCO will continue to closely follow developments in the area and will issue updated guidance as the situation evolves.”

Latest News

Posidonia 2026 takes centre stage amid global freedom of navigation challenges

From insurance and risk management to energy transition, digitalisation and maritime security, the Posidonia... Read more

First maritime compliance & prevention-focused organisation, PaS, joins DBCE

Prevention at Sea (PaS), a leading maritime compliance, auditing, and digital solutions provider, has... Read more

NorthStandard reports strong results and strategic momentum

NorthStandard has reported strong financial results, continued strategic progress and enhanced support... Read more

Latest guidance for vessel transit through Strait of Hormuz

Hundreds of vessels remain unable to transit the Strait of Hormuz and, in the event of a return to more... Read more

The Bahamas regains QUALSHIP 21 eligibility

The Bahamas has regained eligibility for the United States Coast Guard’s QUALSHIP 21 programme... Read more

First dedicated STS standard for dry bulk released by INTERCARGO

Ship to ship (STS) transfers are an established part of dry bulk operations, and they are growing. As... Read more

Columbia reinforces commitment to maritime talent

Columbia Group has strengthened its commitment to developing the next generation of maritime professionals... Read more

Jamaica marks 50 years at IMO with call for island states to shape future

The Maritime Authority of Jamaica has marked Jamaica’s 50th anniversary as a member of the International... Read more

Costamare Bulkers logs first profit after Cargill deal removes most legacy trading

Costamare Bulkers Holdings Limited has reported unaudited financial results for the first quarter ended... Read more

NORDEN strengthens fleet with the addition of four Handysize vessels

NORDEN have announced that they have expanded their fleet with the purchase of four dry cargo Handysize... Read more