FuelEU Maritime compliance strategy is commercial priority, says OceanScore

(Posted on 28/04/25)

FuelEU Maritime represents a strategic headache for shipping companies on the same level as its technical complexity. Senior management must evaluate the variables of different compliance options amid fluid economic parameters to make business-critical decisions - so an effective commercial strategy is vital to mitigate risk and manage outcomes, according to OceanScore.

“The fundamental novelty of FuelEU Maritime is not just its technical complexity, but the need for shipowners and managers to make multiple decisions, often based on unknown or changing parameters, and that these decisions can have significantly differing financial outcomes,” says OceanScore’s Managing Director Albrecht Grell.

This requires a proactive approach guided by a clear and well-informed strategy as decisions made today can have profound financial and operational consequences tomorrow.

According to the maritime data and technology firm, determining such a strategy depends on two intertwined considerations - selecting the most financially viable compliance route, and structuring fair and transparent contractual agreements between shipowners, managers and charterers.

Emerging best practices for compliance

Grell points out that paying the current FuelEU penalty of €2400 per ton of VLSFOe above the GHG intensity reduction threshold is “not a financially viable option”, both because it is three to four times more expensive than alternative compliance options and the penalty increases 10% annually with every consecutive year of payment, thus eroding thin operating margins.

Furthermore, the DOC holder - typically the technical manager - can be liable for heavy penalty payments due to a compliance deficit incurred by the charterer if these liabilities are not reimbursed under a worst-case scenario, given the ‘polluter pays’ principle does not apply with FuelEU.

OceanScore, with a team of 35 specialists focused solely on compliance and regulatory strategy, is seeing industry best practices emerge in terms of compliance strategy based on extensive analytics and interactions with leading shipping companies worldwide. These are based on three main strategic paths - compliance through bunkering of biofuels, procuring compliance surpluses through pooling, and banking surpluses for use in future years.

The use of biofuels has become the most prevalent strategy among companies with control over fuel bunkering, mainly using waste-based UCOME biofuels, according to the firm. When blended and procured in sufficient volumes, these fuels can ensure FuelEU compliance for a vessel or an entire fleet - assuming internal pooling - while also contributing to lower EU ETS costs.

Biofuel use has increased as concerns over technical compatibility in relation to engines and fuel tanks have diminished and availability at major bunkering ports has become less of a constraint.

Navigating variables and trade-offs

However, Grell says: “A strategy based on simply procuring surpluses by pooling with other shipping companies is legally as well as commercially viable – and in many cases appears advantageous versus a biofuel-based approach.”

He claims this offers comparable or better cost-efficiency than biofuels as increased use of the latter on fleets to generate surpluses has reduced demand for pooled surpluses, thereby lowering the cost of this compliance method that also benefits from significant flexibility around pooling in the regulation.

With current low prices for pooling, companies operating in the LNG and LPG trades that generate surpluses may view banking of these surpluses as the most viable option in anticipation of rising prices with higher pooling demand as thresholds tighten towards 2030.

Grell points out though that there are different variables and trade-offs that need to be considered in evaluating compliance strategies, based on factors such as the GHG intensity of specific biofuels, biofuel premiums, currency exchange rates, EU ETS phase-in dynamics and vessel deployment patterns.

Latest News

Liebherr Connect to link people, cranes and digital environment

Liebherr Connect is changing the way people, machines and the environment are connected. With broadly... Read more

Dualog sets a new standard for maritime email

Dualog has announced a significant update to its email solution: individual corporate email accounts... Read more

Naples cargo operator invests in energy-efficient Konecranes Gottwald MHC

Magazzini Generali Silos Frigoriferi (MGSF), part of the Klingenberg Group, has ordered a Konecranes... Read more

Wärtsilä upgrade to deliver emissions savings for Ulusoy bulk carriers

Technology group Wärtsilä will upgrade the Wärtsilä RT-flex main engines... Read more

Steelpaint secures major order for application on 39 bulk vessels

German coatings firm Steelpaint GmbH has secured a major order to supply its specialist Stelpant... Read more

BAR Technologies' WindWings a practical solution

In the wake of the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Marine Environment Protection Committee... Read more

Orderbook for all dry-bulk vessel classes falls by 26% Y-o-Y in Q1

Global economic uncertainty and a cooling of the market has seen newbuild orders for dry-bulk vessels... Read more

Alfa Laval expands its portfolio with NRG Marine acquisition

Alfa Laval has completed the acquisition of UK-based NRG Marine, a leading provider of ultrasonic anti... Read more

MBF and ZESTA MoU to accelerate zero-emission shipping

In a landmark moment for the global maritime industry, the Maritime Battery Forum (MBF) and the Zero... Read more

Bruks Siwertell Group announces leadership transition

Bruks Siwertell Group has announced a leadership transition as Peter Jonsson steps down as CEO after... Read more